Commonplace Holiness Holiness woven into the fabric of life...

Faith and the “Inward Witness”

Several years ago I read a column by Donald W. Haynes — and its content has stayed with me. Haynes used to write a regular “Wesleyan Wisdom” column for the United Methodist Reporter. (I always appreciated what he had to say.)

Donald W. Haynes

The one I’m thinking of was titled “Like Wesley, do we seek an ‘inward witness’?” It appeared in November of 2012. It was about the experience of the assurance of salvation. First, Haynes talks about Wesley’s religious life prior to his famous Aldersgate experience. Was he seeking God? Certainly. Was he seeking a holy life? Certainly. Did he have faith? Yes. But, there was a vital and missing element: an experience of inward assurance. It was this that he found at the prayer meeting at Aldersgate. Haynes writes:

Wesley’s doctrine was sound and his self-discipline was exemplary, but he still lacked what Paul called “witness of the spirit.” Wesley admitted later that he did not understand his father, when the old Anglican on his death bed in April 1735 told him that “inward witness” was the “strongest proof of Christianity.”Surely, many of us know how Wesley must have felt. In the years since revival altar calls gave way to confirmation classes, very little has been said in most United Methodist churches about an experience of assurance that one’s sins are forgiven. Evangelical United Brethren and Methodist children once learned a little chorus: “I’ve got the peace that passeth understanding down in my heart . . . down in my heart today.” The second stanza was the same except the last line, “down in my heart to stay.”

How many of us must confess—while we believe that God loves us, that Jesus Christ is the Son of God who died to save us from our sins, that the Bible is the Word of God, and that we are to reach out with deeds of kindness and acts of mercy—we still have a missing link in our relationship with God? Deep in our soul, there is an empty spot which only the Holy Spirit can fill. Is this not the Achilles heel of multiple millions of Christians? Is this not one important clue to the net loss of 650,000 United Methodists already in the 21st century?

I very much agree with the spirit of this. I believe United Methodism lost something when it distanced itself from the revivalistic elements of its own tradition — out of embarrassment, possibly. Given that the Methodist tradition was begun by a revivalist in the first place, something fundamental is lost when “experienced religion” is no longer considered important.

Yes, but emotion cannot be the measure of faith or spirituality. As I said in my post The Ecstatic Structure of Human Spirituality: “…while spiritual experiences are bound (in the nature of the case) to be emotional experiences, the inverse is not true. Emotion, per se, is not spiritual. Emotional experiences are not necessarily spiritual. So, while emotion should be expected, it is not demanded. If we focus our attention on the emotional component of spirituality, we, in fact, get off track. Emotion is the side effect of spiritual connection. It is expected but not demanded — nor do we know the form such emotions might take. Individuals will respond differently.”

We cannot make emotion the measure of spiritual experiences, though the natural expectation is that spiritual experiences will be emotional. Some people are just more emotional that others.

Assurance of salvation is a privilege rather than a requirement. And, Wesley’s doctrine of the the assurance of salvation was rooted in this passage from the New Testament:

“For you did not receive a spirit of slavery to fall back into fear, but you have received a spirit of adoption. When we cry, “Abba! Father!” it is that very Spirit bearing witness with our spirit that we are children of God….” (Romans 8:15, 16 NRSV).

This is why opinion has changed about Wesley’s spiritual life. Many used to write about Aldersgate as his Christian conversion: his experience of being “born again” through faith in Christ. A better reading (as Haynes points out in the article above) sees the dawn of faith much earlier in his life. But, it lacked fire and assurance.

Wesley himself changed his views (yes, I know he so often says he doesn’t) on this. Hear what he says in the Sermon “On Faith”:

Indeed, nearly fifty years ago, when the Preachers, commonly called Methodists, began to preach that grand scriptural doctrine, salvation by faith, they were not sufficiently apprized of the difference between a servant and a child of God. They did not clearly understand, that even one “who feareth God, and worketh righteousness, is accepted of him.” In consequence of this, they were apt to make sad the hearts of those whom God had not made sad. For they frequently asked those who feared God, “Do you know that your sins are forgiven” And upon their answering, “No,” immediately replied, “Then you are a child of time devil.” No; this does not follow. It might have been said, (and it is all that can be said with propriety,) “Hitherto you are only a servant, you are not a child of God. You have already great reason to praise God that he has called you to his honorable service. Fear not. Continue crying unto him, `and you shall see greater things than these.'”

Yes, one could live as a servant of God. But, there are higher privileges: one can have the experience of living as a child of God, naturally calling out to God (as Paul says): “Abba, Father.”

It seems to me that in Wesley’s day the religious options were these. (1.) Calvinism (at least at that time) offered a life of faith without assurance. Yes, the Elect will unfailingly persevere until the end — by the sovereign and absolute will of God. But, how could anyone know they were in that Elect number? Some who have faith at one point loose it at another — thereby proving they were not elect. You cannot know. All you can do is believe and serve. Living a holy life to the end is the only final proof of election. (2.) The option Wesley chose to pursue was (as Haynes points out) to seek “‘holiness of heart and life’ within his Anglican tradition.” This was a life of study and discipline and service. But, again, it gave no assurance. And, because it is a religion of good works, it tends toward self-righteousness.

John Wesley (1703-1791)

The revolution of Aldersgate was a discovery of the privilege of the Witness of the Spirit. And, it was the revolution of a grace-based pursuit of the holy life. For a long time, it made him feel that all that had gone before was a sham. It’s easy to see why. But, in truth, he had been a servant of God before Aldersgate — he was simply living below his faith-privileges.

I am sure that neither the Calvinists nor the Anglican Arminians of Wesley’s day could foresee the deadly way Calvinism and Arminianism would become mingled together in the popular evangelicalism of our day. Now, we find Assurance of Salvation (the wonderful spiritual discovery Wesley experienced and proclaimed) mixed together with Calvinistic Eternal Security. Thus, a person knows they are a child of God by an experience of salvation by faith, at which time they are given an free ride to Heaven which cannot be forfeited!

How could such a teaching ever have been created?

Certainly the Calvinists and Arminians of Wesley’s day could not have predicted the appearance of such a theological bastard: an assurance, not simply of relationship to God, but of final salvation. Now, suddenly, the assurance of salvation become license to sin, instead of being the motive power of holy living. For, both the Calvinists and the Arminians were insisting on a holy life.

Now, this has been overturned by a Christianity that is a status conferred by a faith-experience.

And, the nails are driven into the coffin of Christian living by misinterpreting Jesus himself.

“Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” (John 14:6 NRSV).

Here Jesus tells us that He is the One who determines who will “come to the Father.” Jesus is the way.

But, what has this become? It has become: an experience of saving faith is the only way to the Father. Anyone who has such an experience has the assurance of a salvation that can never be forfeited — and a salvation that already includes forgiveness for any and all future sins. Suddenly, in that case, it is no longer Jesus who is the “way and the truth and the life” — but an emotional faith experience!

Amazing! And, horrible.

Could Wesley have ever guessed that the doctrine of the Witness of the Spirit that he so powerfully proclaimed would one day be the foundation stone to a doctrine that granted a license to sin to anyone who had an emotional religious encounter?

I am sure he could not.


Comments (2) | Trackback

2 Responses

  1. Rand M Sutor April 14, 2020 / 4:34 am

    I don’t understand how Donald Haynes could imply that John Wesley didn’t have an inward witness. How could he have received sanctification without an inward witness? That’s impossible. As far as the Methodists losing 650,000 members in the 21st century alone, I don’t imagine there is a mainline denomination that has not not lost many because they are all dead “TO” Christ instead of being dead “IN” Christ. The Bible speaks of a great falling away in the ladder days but Wesley himself is not responsible for this. The denomination itself has gone cold like all the others. They are trying to EARN Heaven instead of putting their faith in the One Who earned it FOR us.

  2. Rand M Sutor April 14, 2020 / 4:51 am

    I want you to know that my previous post was meant only to speak against what Haynes said about Wesley, not to offend you. I really enjoy Commonplace Holiness abundantly. Without it, I would not know of Phoebe Palmer’s writings and many other writers of Holiness received through Sanctification. Through your site God has been enabled to work in my heart abundantly! Thank you! This site is very much needed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *